![]() ![]() įowler's Modern English Usage describes the use of the comma splice by the authors Elizabeth Jolley and Iris Murdoch: The comma splice is more commonly found in works from the 18th and 19th century, when written prose mimicked speech more closely. Some authors use commas to separate short clauses only. ![]() ![]() In literature Ĭomma splices are also occasionally used in fiction, poetry, and other forms of literature to convey a particular mood or informal style. Ĭomma splices often arise when writers use conjunctive adverbs (such as furthermore, however, or moreover) to separate two independent clauses instead of using a coordinating conjunction. But even when all three criteria are met, some readers are likely to object. Ost usage authorities accept comma splices when (1) the clauses are short and closely related, (2) there is no danger of a miscue, and (3) the context is informal. According to Garner's Modern English Usage: Sometimes the two types of sentences are treated differently based on the presence or absence of a comma, but most writers consider the comma splice as a special type of run-on sentence. Ĭomma splices are similar to run-on sentences, which join two independent clauses without any punctuation and without a coordinating conjunction such as and, but for, etc. The gate swung apart, the bridge fell, the portcullis was drawn up. advises using a semicolon, not a comma, to join two grammatically complete clauses, except when the clauses are "very short" and "similar in form", for example: The original 1918 edition of The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. Comma splices are rare in most published writing but are common among inexperienced writers of English. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |